Sunday, November 2, 2008

Sharvani Srivastava

“A Man with a Meinkampf Look”: The Nazis of Plath’s Life
Shots could be heard as the hordes of men ran towards each other. Bomb blasts followed by a shower of dust decorated the field. Bodies lay on the ground, motionless, as some miles away, a race was to be exterminated through torturous death. It was a dismal scene, yet still a scene used commonly in Sylvia Plath’s poems. Her style being confessional poetry, Plath wrote of her like and motivations for committing suicide. Plath thought the pain she experienced was comparable to the suffering the Jews endured in the Holocaust. Using what she thought was a similarity, Plath incorporated World War II and Holocaust imagery in many of her poems to more accurately reflect her agony. Though in both “Daddy” and “Lady Lazarus” Sylvia Plath uses Holocaust imagery, these two poems differ in the way they portray Plath being controlled, her enemy’s role, and her attempts at suicide.
As a woman, Plath feels controlled by society in general, and since specific parts of society control her differently, she uses the two different poems “Lady Lazarus” and “Daddy” to address the two parts that influence her. In “Lady Lazarus”, Plath talks of her desires and attempts to commit suicide, but also tells of how each time she has attempted suicide she has been prevented from doing so by being saved. By the tone of the poem, Plath portrays her dislike of being saved since it causes her excessive physical and emotional pain. However, she realizes her saviors disregard her thoughts since they believe it right for her to be stopped, and they, as a result, gain glory for saving her life. Her saviors are controlling whether she dies or not without her own permission. To portray this matter of life and death, Plath turns to Holocaust imagery. She shows that similar to the Jews in the Holocaust, an outside source has the final say of whether a person should die or not, however, in opposite ways: the Jews are controlled and tortured by the Nazis who sentenced them to death, however ironically, Plath is controlled and tortured by those who sentence her to life. However in “Daddy”, Plath is controlled differently by the same use of Jew and Nazi imagery. In “Daddy”, Plath claims she “barely [dared] to breath” in her black shoe “in which [she has] lived like a foot” (“Daddy” 2-5). In her time, women did not have much freedom, and Plath herself found it difficult to be a wife, mother, and a poet at once. She had to live within the roles of women in society, her black shoe, which was dictated by the men in her life. However, the poem progresses to become more personal, rather than just comment on the rigid roles of women. Her father’s death, she claims, in turn controlled her mental state as to want to die and “get back, back, back to [him]” (“Daddy” 59). Later her husband also slowly mentally killed Plath and caused her to consider suicide as well since she says as a comparison he “drank [her] blood for…seven years” (“Daddy” 73-74). In “Daddy”, Plath is a Jew that is controlled mentally since both her father and husband leave her, but in “Lady Lazarus”, she in controlled physically since the matter of life and death is dictated.
Each time Plath is portrayed as a Jew, her poem always has an enemy of hers and of the Jew’s portrayed as a Nazi. Plath addresses “Herr Doktor. So, Herr Enemy” contradicting the norm since most people would consider a doctor beneficial, one who aids the hurt, however, to Plath a doctor is no better than a Nazi (“Lady Lazarus”65-66). During the Holocaust, the Nazi doctors determined whether a Jew should be killed, making them the Jews’ enemies. For Plath the doctors determine whether she lives, also making them her enemy. The sentence to death and life are both forms of torture for the recipients. Contrarily, the poem “Daddy” speaks of Plath’s father and how she has “always been scared of [him], with [his] Luftwaffe, [his] gobbledygoo” (“Daddy” 41-42). Plath is again controlled by a cruel German who she personifies not to be a savior like in “Lady Lazarus”, but her own father. Before and after his death, Otto Plath had a large influence on Plath, and since “every woman adores a Fascist”, when he died, Plath felt the need to replace one dominating male figure with another, her husband Ted Hughes (“Daddy 38). Alas, Ted Hughes left Plath too, and the betrayal of the men she loved the most caused Plath to commit suicide, thus making them her enemies. Contrarily to one another, “Lady Lazarus” names Plath’s enemies as those who save her from death, however, “Daddy” claims her enemies are those who caused her to commit suicide in the first place.
The use of Holocaust imagery was to help the audience understand the torment Plath had to face. The idea of the pain caused by wanting to die and hating those who prevent her from doing so is a difficult concept for mentally stable people to understand, but by referring to the Holocaust, a widely known event, Plath ensures that the audience can at least begin to comprehend the level of pain she endured. Yet, this use to Holocaust imagery can only be taken to a certain point, and many argue that Plath crossed the line and lowered the actually historical effect the Holocaust has on people. Plath’s pain and suffering was nowhere close to that of the Jews in the Holocaust, and her father and husband were defiantly not Nazi-like personas, and the doctors, unlike the Nazis, had only good intentions for Plath. Yet, her disillusioned idea that the sufferings were comparable, just adds to the notion that Plath was mentally unstable and needed poetry since it was the only way to express and possibly try to cure herself.
Words: 968

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Vicky Tu
Period 1

Your anecdote is really attention-catching! It really makes the reader want to read what direction you're heading. Your entire introduction transitions from the hook to the thesis of your essay very well.

There's some awkward wording in the essay: "Her style being confessional poetry, Plath wrote of her like and motivations for committing suicide." in the first paragraph could probably be altered to fit the professional tone of the rest of your essay.

You repeat a bit, especially in sentences that come right after one another. For instance, "...however ironically, Plath is controlled and tortured by those who sentence her to life. However in “Daddy”..." Here, you use "however" twice in two consecutive sentences.

You bring up a good point in your conclusion by covering the opposition's view, and I see why you put it there, but it's a new contention and probably shouldn't be brought up in the conclusion, which is supposed to wrap up everything you spoke about in your essay. However, it really is a good idea to talk about the opposition, but, because it's a new subject, don't put it in the conclusion.

MahaDarshan said...

Darshana Prakasam
Period 4

1. I really enjoyed reading your essay as it was both creative and analytical. Your hook was a great attention grabber that flowed very well into your analysis. It is usually very difficult to have such a smooth transition. You had an excellent understanding of the text which was made apparent through your detailed analysis. Your language was generally very clear and you made your point very well. You chose a pretty narrow topic which made your essay very focused as you did not stray from the topic. Very good job and the following comments are only suggestions that can hopefully make your great essay greater!

2.

a) In your first body paragraph you use the phrase "controlled by" a lot as that is the aspect that you are analyzing. However, this phrasing is a little awkward as seen in "As a woman, Plath feels controlled by society in general, and since specific parts of society control her differently". While the reader will understand what you say, by rephrasing a little, you will be even clearer. I suggest that you use phrases such as "manipulated by" or "restricted" . For example, you can reword the sentence "Her saviors are controlling whether she dies or not without her own permission. " to something along the lines of "Her saviors determine life or death for her without her consent".
b) While I like how most of your essay is worded, you do need to cut down your word count. You can do this by making some of your sentences and 'discussions' less elaborate and more concise. Beginning with the first body paragraph, the first part of it when you discuss "Lady Lazarus" can be rephrased and combined a little. You wrote:

"In “Lady Lazarus”, Plath talks of her desires and attempts to commit suicide, but also tells of how each time she has attempted suicide she has been prevented from doing so by being saved. By the tone of the poem, Plath portrays her dislike of being saved since it causes her excessive physical and emotional pain. However, she realizes her saviors disregard her thoughts since they believe it right for her to be stopped, and they, as a result, gain glory for saving her life."

can be said maybe like this:

"In "Lady Lazarus" Sylvia Plath discusses her desire to die but how every suicide is thwarted. Through the tone of the poem, she expresses her disdain for her saviors who had assumed that saving her was the right decision. "
You can add a little or take it out but that is the general idea.

For the second body paragraph, you can make it shorter by quickly making the point that Herr Doktor and Herr Enemy are the same to Plath because contrary to society's norms, Plath believes doctors are not beneficial and are as bad as Nazis.

c) You use your conclusion effectively by answering the "so what" question, but you do not want to bring up other points because it will make your essay end in a rather inconclusive way. By saying, "Plath’s pain and suffering was nowhere close to that of the Jews in the Holocaust" it seems like you are arguing against her comparison. Rather, you could mention that it is like a hyperbole that shows her distorted view of her pain. You can just concentrate on how it helps the reader understand what Sylvia Plath says and how it reveals her disillusioned perception of those who had good or at least not harmful intentions.

d) Your thesis is a little misleading to the rest of your essay because it seems like you are going to put less emphasis on Holocaust imagery and more emphasis on the contrast between how "Daddy" and "Lady Lazarus" use them. This is because it says "Though in both Daddy and Lady Lazarus Sylvia Plath uses Holocaust imagery...". This would have been okay, but your conclusion reveals that you are concentrating how how Sylvia Plath used Holocaust imagery.

As a general note, you should look over your essay and find small errors such as defiantly instead of definitely. These are just typos though, so no big deal!

Overall, great job and I really hope all the comments help!! I enjoyed reading and commenting on this essay.