Sunday, November 2, 2008

Emma Krenzin-Blank

“It’s a Sad Diagnosis”: The War of the Animals

“And like the cat I have nine times to die” (Lady Lazarus 21). Often throughout Plath’s poetry animals are used as symbols of death or destruction. Typical animals are portrayed in a war-like nature and can paint images of evil. When considering that a cat “has nine times to die” the animal is looked upon in a sinister manner, alluding to its unnatural ability. Also, many bugs and less appealing animals are used to represent an image of disgust. Sylvia Plath uses animals throughout her poems to show negative feelings of danger or repulsion, often represented by typical pets such as a cat.
Average animals are often referenced in metaphors comparing human experiences to that of an unpleasant sensation caused by an animal. In particular Plath uses the image of a cat to reference death and fear. She describes the cat as having nine times to die, alluding to its representation of death itself. She paints a picture of this fear by saying, “They are opening like the mouth of some great African cat” (Tulips 59). While Plath is actually referring to tulips blooming in the spring, she uses a simile to describe them as dangerous animals. The image of the great African cat connotatively leaves the reader with a sense of horror at the “great African” beasts. Another typical animal Plath references is a dog. When picturing a dog, the first image that comes to mind is not one of a ferocious animal. However, Plath describes dogs with similar qualities of bloodthirsty wolves, hungry for a fight. In particular she says, “Condoning the beak, the claw, the grin of the dog/Yellow-haunched, a pack dog,/Grinning over its bone of ivory” (The Swarm 22-24). This passage shows the dog as a deadly animal that chews on bones of ivory. The terror that Plath creates when describing the normal pet is used to establish fear and trouble. When picturing a cat or a dog in Plath’s poetry a sense of danger envelopes the reader and alters their perception of innocence.
In particular, Plath’s warnings of danger are often described in a war-like atmosphere. The battles she depicts are not typical human skirmishes, but that of animals in the fray. The focus of The swarm is that of a chaotic fight, involving many animals such as the bees who had, “stings as big as drawing pins” (The Swarm 56). In this, Plath is using drawing pins as an allusion to swords, which the bees confronted each other with. The poem is a war between animals, showing that even creatures people think of a beautiful and ingenuous are evil in the end. Other animals are involved, including “a flying hedgehog, all prickles” which helps to add to the image of a battle between all animals (The Swarm 32). The fight can be thought of as alluding to human wars because of its Napoleonic references. Plath is using the sadness of a battle between animals to portray the reality of warfare. By using images of innocent creatures she is able to attract attention to the cruel details and death involved in war. In comparison, Plath states, “To the same place, the same face, the same brute” in Lady Lazarus to show that human qualities can be the same as a “brute” or an animal (53). All in all, the ferocity of the pure animals shows an immediate contrast to their typical nature and illustrates how dangerous they can be.
In addition to danger, Plath conveys a feeling of disgust when describing certain animals. Especially when discussing bugs she paints an image of revulsion. When describing herself attempting to die, Plath says they had to call for her, “And pick the worms off me like sticky pearls” (Lady Lazarus 42). The worms are used in a simile comparing them to pearls, a human-like necklace. By matching pearls to the worms Plath again uses animals to determine negative human qualities. The “sticky pearls” give a sickening image and make the reader dislike the awful bugs. In Stillborn, Plath describes babies as being dead, “though they have a piggy and a fishy air” (12). By depicting the babies as dead and then comparing to them to pigs and fish a pessimistic meaning behind the animals surfaces. The disgust that is felt when describing death passes on to the normal animals and gives the poem a tone of sadness. Consequently, by portraying the animals as unpleasant creatures Plath shows an off-putting side that makes the reader think negatively when imagining them.
Throughout Plath’s poetry animals can be seen as innocent and childlike. When evaluated closely however, the animals take shape of beasts meant to scare and disgust the reader. By alluding to death when describing certain animals, Plath gives the creatures a sadly feared label. When expressing qualities of human happiness, such as watching the flowers bloom Plath reverts their denotation, such as, “The tulips should be behind bars like dangerous animals” (Tulips 58). By stating that animals are dangerous and should be kept behind bars Plath concludes a deeper meaning that animals should be feared. A typically joyous image, animals are used to create sadness through destruction and disgust, “It’s a sad diagnosis” (Stillborn 1).

3 comments:

hijuice said...

Your title seems a bit off from your essay because it mentions "The War of the Animals", but you're trying to prove that it depicts the war between humans.
In your intro, I would do more of connecting death and disgust to "a sinister manner" because they sound like quite separated ideas.
In your first body paragraph, you should probably either define "Average animals" and "typical animal" or word it differently. You should also probably mention where the first quote that you used comes from. When you say "This passage shows the dog as a deadly animal that chews on the bones of ivory.", you don't elaborate where the "terror" you keep mentioning comes from. If you were to put the source of this terror, it would probably make your analysis you have later on more complete.
Your second body paragraph starts off a bit abstract with the words "In particular". You should elaborate on what it's particular to. The poem titles "The Swarm" and "Lady Lazarus" should also be in quotation marks. I really like how you connected the two poems together and referenced to Napoleonic instances. I think that to help your analysis out, you should reference more specific events in Napoleon's life.
I don't really see any major problems in your third body paragraph, but I would suggest going in depth about this topic a bit more seeing as the topic of danger is described quite excessively.
Your conclusion ends this essay nicely too. The line "Plath concludes a deeper meaning that animals should be feared" gets the idea across, but I think you should word it better.

Nishtha Bhatt said...

I really liked the stuff that you found! Love the opening-"And like the cat I have nine times to die"-makes me very intrigued.
1. I think that the quote "Also, many bugs and less appealing animals are used to represent an image of disgust" from the first paragraph can be rephrased, as i personally believe bugs are as unappealing as animals can get.
2. Maybe edit your thesis, mostly where it says "often represented by typical pets such as a cat"-since its a thesis, I think you should list all the "typical pets" you plan to talk about in your essay
3. Since your essay is about animal imagery, in the topic sentnece for your second paragraph, i think that instead of getting straight to the point by saying "In particular, Plath’s warnings of danger are often described in a war-like atmosphere" you should somehow mention animals/animal imagery, just to continue the flow of your essay.

Great work.

Kaitlyn said...

Firstly, i liked yoru essay :]

1. "Another typical animal Plath references is a dog. When picturing a dog, the first image that comes to mind is not one of a ferocious animal. However, Plath describes dogs with" Since poulsen doesn't like wordiness, you could totally cut out the sentence "when picturing...ferocious animal. However,"

2. "In particular, Plath’s warnings of danger are often described in a war-like atmosphere." That sentence is a little confusing. Maybe add a sentence to clarify what it means? or maybe change it up to fit the rest of the paragraph better.

3. "By depicting the babies as dead and then comparing to them to pigs and fish a pessimistic meaning behind the animals surfaces" That sounds sort of awkward. Maybe change it up to "By depicting the babies as dead and then comparing them to pigs and fish, Plath puts forth a pessimisitc meaning to the animals."