Sunday, November 2, 2008

Howard Park

"Sun's Blade": Sylvia Plath and her Heavenly Bodies

Sylvia Plath was a female poet during a time in which the occupation was dominated by males in the society. She wrote about her life through many means, including imagery and symbolism. A particularly interesting image used in many of her poems is the image of heavenly bodies, such as comets, clouds, sun, stars, moon, planets, etc. Through these she portrays people; men, women, members of society, etc. Many times these roles can be filled by herself while others are filled by people around her, such as by her husband for the sun. Though used for the same purposes they are put out in very different ways.
What do a cloud and a comet have in common? In the context of Sylvia Plath’s poems, quite a lot. They are both temporary as acknowledged by Sylvia. “[cloud’s] own slow / Effacement at the wind’s hand.” (“Morning Song”, 8-9). And also “Scar in the sky, red comet”. Both instances show something that is temporary, and waning. And in the poems they both represent people who Sylvia Plath could be, a cloud mother and a comet maverick. Plath is a mother and quite often acted in a rebellious manor. Also in both instances, it is something that Plath didn’t plan on becoming, she didn’t really plan on being a mother and she didn’t plan on being a rebel, as shown in both the poems.
What differences do a cloud and comet have? Besides the obvious, the cloud could symbolize just about any mother where as the comet only symbolizes Sylvia Plath and her views about how society works. Since the ideas posed upon us by the idea of the comet is that of becoming a “queen bee”, Sylvia Plath says that she tries very hard to become a queen bee and not just a regular drone, what she means by this is that she wants to rise above others and become special. Later in the poems she realizes that the only way for anyone to become a queen bee and become special is to get out and away from the society itself, to become a rebel. This is when, while flying from the hive, Plath describes herself as a comet. The cloud could be used to describe anyone since Plath is giving her testimony about her experience as a mother, which is not all that different from what most other mothers would experience.
So what can be said about her writing is that she uses heavenly bodies to symbolize people in her life as well as herself. Heavenly bodies are used to represent people or figures in Sylvia Plath’s life, but the ways that she does this differs bit by bit from poem to poem Sylvia Plath writes in a way called confessional poetry, which means that the poems are quite personal for her. If we learn what Sylvia Plath is trying to tell us maybe it can give us better insight into her poems and thus her life, since the poems are about her..

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I like how you started your body paragraphs with questions, it's different and keept me occupied.

I think you shouldn't have used the word "etc." so mant times in your opening paragraph, it made it seem like you don't know what you're talking about, try just cutting that out, or only listing the heavnly bodies you are going to talk about.

"So what can be said about her writing" I didn't like this as a closer, it is too informal, try something more consise. Like "In conclusion" "This shows" those kinds of things.

"a cloud mother and a comet maverick" this kind of confused me when I first read it, try explaing this before, or using punctuation to cleraly define them.
Ex:
" a cloud (mother) and a comet (maverick)"
something along those lines basically

-Kiersten Piekarz

Anonymous said...

1.) You had an excellent understanding of the text shown by your clear connections to textual evidence and the image you were trying to connect it to- heavenly bodies. Good job!

2.) You should include detailed, more-in-depth evidences such as in: "Both instances show something that is temporary, and waning." You could relate this to why Plath would include the textual evidence you chose in "Morning Song" and how it impacted the themes/motives of the poem.

Although I understand making questions in the beginning of paragraphs may grab the readers' attention, but it was a sort of distraction for me. As I was reading the paragraph after the question, the question made no difference to me. All I wanted to know was how heavenly bodies affected Plath's poetry.

Informality is an aspect I caught onto quickly. "So what can be said about her writing is that she uses heavenly bodies to symbolize people in her life as well as herself." You could change it to: "With all things considered, Plath uses heavenly bodies in her writing to symbolize people in her life as well as herself." Tweaking should only be done with "So what can be said about..." the rest is fine.

Zahra said...

Zahra Period 1
I really like how you used the zipping technique, this made the essay flow better.

You keeping saying over and over "Sylvia Plath" you should just say "Plath" that makes the piece of writing more formal.

Your conclusion also need improvement.

"So what can be said about her writing is that she uses heavenly bodies to symbolize people in her life as well as herself. Heavenly bodies are used to represent people or figures in Sylvia Plath’s life..."
For example in this statement you just repeat your self. You should take out the first sentance and just write: "Heavenly bodies are used to represent people or figures in Sylvia Plath’s life..."

Agentkay said...

1) "and waning. And in the poems" Gasp! You should fix that, but as far as I know that's the only mistake I saw

2) "Very hard to become a queen bee and not just a regular drone" Interesting point, you could probably take this a step further with the role of the drone in the bee community, after all her father probably taught her this. So it may be alright to assume that she knows what a drone does. Because she could've have used something else like a regular bee. Possible emasculating oneself?

3) Good point I liked the relation between the cloud and the comet.How they are both temporary and what not. I'd like to see if there was another reference of these celestial bodies, but your essay is fine and the point is made through.