Sunday, November 2, 2008

Darshana Prakasam

The Five Senses: How Sylvia Plath uses Imagery to Communicate

            Smell, taste, hear, see and feel.  These are how people experience the world.  Imagery or vivid descriptions in literature evoke these five senses to add meaning and life to the pieces.  A common literary tool, imagery frequently appears throughout Sylvia Plath’s poetry.  With it, she expresses her feelings and thoughts about the world around her.  Although she employs many types of imagery from death to season and weather, one specific types is that of the Holocaust and Nazism.  Sylvia Plath utilizes Holocaust and Nazi imagery in “Lady Lazarus” and “Daddy” to communicate her feelings of exploitation and pain.

            Both poems, with Holocaust and Nazi imagery, describe and explain the concept of exploitation.  In “Lady Lazarus”, Plath discusses wanting to die, but inevitably being saved every time. Moreover, each suicide attempt is publicized, turning her private story into a public story.   This leads her to feel exploited and used for the public’s benefit, leaving her with absolutely nothing for herself.  Consequently, when she writes, “A sort of walking miracle,/ my skin/ Bright as a Nazi lampshade,/ My right foot / A paperweight,” she communicates these feelings (“Lady Lazarus” 4-9).    Beginning with Nazi lampshade, this references the Holocaust when Germans would often experiment and sometimes create objects such as lampshades from the skin of Jews.  The lampshade from skin and the paperweight from her foot provide examples of how the Jews were not shown respect or their lives valued and how they were used for others’ benefit.  Something as personal as skin was taken and used as a household item.  By using this imagery, Plath says that she relates to that situation and is feeling what the Jews felt.  Likewise, in “Daddy”, recurring Nazi and Holocaust imagery explain the exploitation of her feelings, which led to her frustration with her father.   She writes, “Not God but a swastika / So black no sky could squeak through / Every woman adores a Fascist, / The boot in the face, the brute” (“Daddy” 46-49).  She uses the famous symbol of the Nazis, the swastika, and mentions Fascism to represent the power they brandished over everyone like a God, forcing people to listen and obey. They had to “adore” or they would receive a “boot in the face” (“Daddy” 47, 48).  They pushed their desires across, disregarding the feelings of the Jews.  It is a representation of how Plath felt when she communicated, or rather tried to, with her father.  He conveyed his own opinions and thoughts but she was not able to express her feelings in the same way.  In this way, she feels that her feelings were exploited and she was used as a tool for her father’s benefit.  Though “Lady Lazarus” and “Daddy” relate to different situations, they both similarly use Holocaust and Nazi imagery to convey the exploitation of feelings.

            Another employment of Nazi and Holocaust imagery, “Lady Lazarus” and “Daddy” represent the pain that Plath feels from her thwarted suicide attempts as well as her inability to communicate with her father.  In “Lady Lazarus”, when she writes that her skin was “bright as a Nazi lampshade”, a feeling of pain is immediately evoked. (“Lady Lazarus” 5)   It leads the reader to imagine the torture Jews must have gone through to have their skin used in such barbaric ways.  While this references physical pain, Plath uses it to correlate with her thoughts on being brought back to life every time she tries to end it.  She explains the pain of having to continue living without a desire to do so.  People were so intent on believing that saving Plath was a compassionate gesture, they ignored the point of view of Plath.  This is the same with the Jews who were not given an opportunity to voice their opinions against the actions of the Germans, unfairly put through physical pain.   Utilizing this powerful imagery, she conveys how saving her was just as malicious as what the Germans did.  Furthermore, in “Daddy”, she exhibits the pain she feels from the communication barrier between her and her “daddy”.  Physical and mental pain is portrayed when she writes that, “[her] tongue stuck in [her] jaw. / It stuck in a barb wire snare.” (“Daddy” 25-26).   Such a vivid image immediately presents an excruciatingly painful situation, but beyond that, it presents the barbwire fences of the Holocaust and the pain those camps brought to the Jews.  The fences cut them off from the rest of the world and prevented them from speaking out to the Germans.  Plath constantly refers to herself as a Jew by writing “I think I may well be a Jew.” (“Daddy” 35) and “I may be a bit of a Jew” (“Daddy” 40) and compares her father with a German with phrases such as “ your Aryan eye” (“Daddy” 44).  This further reinforces her symbolizing the concept of  just as the Jews were unable to express themselves to the Nazis, Plath was unable to articulate herself to her father.  “Lady Lazarus” and “Daddy” have different enveloping themes but their utilization of the Holocaust imagery paralleled each other. 

             Imagery is a useful literary tool that allows the reader to feel what the author feels, allowing the reader to feel a connection with the author.  Plath includes a lot of imagery in her poetry as almost extended analogies to her situations to make the reader better understand what she is describing.  With the Holocaust and Nazi imagery, she provides what she believes to be a point of comparison for she believes the magnitude of suffering of the Jews closely paralleled her own suffering.  Evoking the five senses, Sylvia Plath additionally evoked understanding and compassion from the readers.

Word Count: 924

3 comments:

Unknown said...

Sharvani Srivastava
Period 1

1. I think your essay made its point very well! First of all, you had an excellent understanding of the two poems you chose analyze. Not only did you know the general meaning of the poem, but you knew the specific meaning of the small details of them too. You definitely had a clearly focused argument, with logical organization. And you really showed the effects of narrative features in the text, specifically imagery of course, on the meaning of the two poems. The quotes really help your analysis and are well incorporated. Also I really liked you conclusion because it had the "so what" factor in it, showing how the imagery effects not only the meaning of the poems, but Plath's life and the audience reading the poems.

2.a. "Smell, taste, hear, see and feel. These are how people experience the world." I think that your attention-grabber can be better. It is not bad right now, but I definitely know that it can be more interesting. Maybe instead of stating the senses themselves, but you can give examples of them. Maybe something like, "Smelling the flowers while walking down the rocky path, and dragging her arm along the rail" Something similar might be more of a hook with what you used originally after it, or you may want to change it altogether and not mention the senses. But it is fine right now, this is just a suggestion.
b. "In “Lady Lazarus”, when she writes that her skin was “bright as a Nazi lampshade”, a feeling of pain is immediately evoked." Though this quote is well integrated, I think it might be a little too repetitive because you use this quote for the paragraph before it to make two different points. You might want to choose a different quote for this point or the point in the paragraph before so it gives some variation in the quotes and some other quote can be better served in one paragraph.
c. "The fences cut them off from the rest of the world and prevented them from speaking out to the Germans. Plath constantly refers to herself as a Jew by writing “I think I may well be a Jew.” (“Daddy” 35) and “I may be a bit of a Jew” (“Daddy” 40) and compares her father with a German with phrases such as “ your Aryan eye” (“Daddy” 44)." I feel the flow in between the first quote and the series of quotes after it is not quite right. I know later in the analysis you explain what the first quote about the fence meant, but up till then, the audience is left hanging, while a sort of digression is made to explain how Plath portrays herself as a Jew. So I think you should explain this concept early on in the essay, maybe even the first paragraph since it relates to your entire analysis rather than adding it in the middle of another analysis. I think this will improve the flow, and make a bigger impact on the analysis of the first quote.

All in all, very nice essay! I enjoyed reading it since I had not thought about some of the interpretations you discuss in the essay. Good job!

jeopardyboy said...

Guess who?
Me! :] Okay, let's get to it...

I very much enjoyed the structure of the essay. It's easy to read and provides a nice effect as the paper progresses. The essay culminates to a point as it ends, also a good feature worth mention.

1) The big one: word count. You could trim this one down in a couple of places, specifically: "Moreover, each suicide attempt is publicized, turning her private story into a public story." Two "publics." Also: "Something as personal as skin was taken and used as a household item." You probably don't need this; you've explained the idea quite well previously.

2) Third paragraph: While this references physical pain...the Germans did." A lot of this seems to be narrative, which is not necessarily detrimental. You might want to analyze the quote more rather than prepare for the future.

3) Conclusion: "Evoking the five senses, Sylvia Plath additionally evoked..." A more effective choice for the first might be "stimulating."

It was hard to find three things. As you can likely see, they're all related in some way. >.< Good job!

-Edward

IB English 1 said...

1. Very thorough understanding of the poems and their meanings. You have a very concise argument that is supported by good quotes and analysis. I really like the first sentence in the introduction too! Very catchy.

2. A) "The lampshade from skin and the paperweight from her foot provide examples of how the Jews were not shown respect or their lives valued and how they were used for others’ benefit." I read it out loud and it sounds awkward at the "how Jews were not shown respect or their lives valued..." Maybe I am wrong, but try reading it outloud and see what you think.
B)"This further reinforces her symbolizing the concept of just as the Jews were unable to express themselves to the Nazis..." it seems like you are missing something between "of" and "just". There is more space there, so just checking.
C)"Evoking the five senses, Sylvia Plath additionally evoked understanding and compassion from the readers." I like how you brought the five senses back into the conclusion.


-Danielle Schenck
Period 4